US 24 West

Study complete

About the Study

The US 24 West Environmental Assessment (EA) and the US 24 West Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) are complete and available for you to download and read by clicking the appropriate link below.

Access the US 24 West Environmental Assessment (EA)
Review the US 24 FONSI
Proposed Action
Frequently Asked Questions

This multi-year journey stated in the fall of 2004. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sponsored the project and assembled the team of CDOT, FHWA and the consulting firms of CH2M HILL and Wilson & Company.

One of the additional elements proposed by the design-build contractor and accepted by CDOT as part of the I-25/Cimarron Interchange Design Build improvements project is a new road connection between 8^th and US 24/Cimarron streets through the site previously cleared of the old Express Inn structure. This new quadrant cut-off road connection will greatly reduce traffic at the existing 8^th Street/US 24 intersection (by 20 percent on weekdays and 40 percent on weekends). It will postpone the need for additional improvements at this location for several years. The new road connection is scheduled for completion by summer 2017.

Proposed Action

The proposed action for US 24 West from I-25 to the Manitou Avenue Exit includes the following elements:

Maintain four through-lanes (two in each direction) between I-25 and 21st Street.
Add two through-lanes, between 21st Street and just west of Ridge Road, for a total of six through-lanes (three in each direction).
Replace nine bridges on US 24 and cross streets to accommodate the profile changes to US 24. Over Fountain Creek, these bridges would be built to comply with current state and local standards to reduce flooding hazards in the study area.
Due to replacement of the nine bridges, realign and widen Fountain Creek at bridge crossings and locations where the roadway overlaps the existing channel to provide an armored low-flow channel and a widened stabilized area to accommodate the 100-year flood.

Build single-point diamond interchange (SPDI) with a loop ramp for eastbound-to-northbound travel at US 24 and I-25. This interchange design replaces the tight diamond interchange identified in the I-25 Improvements through the Colorado Springs Urbanized Area EA (CDOT, 2004). Since that EA was approved, traffic forecasts and future traffic operations have been revised by the Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG), making a SPDI design more efficient operationally.

Naegle Road from 21st Street to 25th Street would be closed because the intersection of 21st Street and Naegle Road is too close to the US 24 and 21st Street interchange. There is inadequate room to provide a turn lane for vehicles at Naegle Road.
The existing 25th Street bridge over Fountain Creek would be removed because it would no longer connect to Naegle Road and, therefore, provide no function. The existing 25th Street would be ended north of the Fountain Creek.

Replace the existing at-grade intersections with interchanges at 8th Street and at 21^st Street, which also includes directional interchange ramps and acceleration/deceleration lanes.
Upgrade the US 24 and 26th Street at-grade intersection, which also includes left and right turn lanes.
Widen the intersection of US 24 and 31st Street. Widen the 31st Street and Colorado Avenue intersection. South of US 24, 31st Street would be rebuilt to better align with the highway intersection.
Replace the existing at-grade intersection with an overpass that carries US 24 over Ridge Road. Ridge Road would be widened between High Street and Colorado Avenue and improvements would be made to the Ridge Road and Colorado Avenue intersection.
All improvements tie into the unimproved, existing US 24 approximately 1,800 feet west of Ridge Road. Because neither existing nor future congestion is a problem between Ridge Road and Manitou Avenue, no changes to US 24 are proposed west of Ridge Road.
Build sidewalks on the north-south cross streets at all intersections and as a part of all interchanges.
Connect the Midland Trail from 21st to 25th Street, with north-south trail connections at each of the interchanges and intersections along the US 24 corridor. The trail would be built to meet the City of Colorado Spring’s trail design standards and to allow clearance under the bridges for bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian crossings. Completing this east-west bicycle and pedestrian trail system was an opportunity resulting from the required roadway right-of-way acquisitions and the channel re-grading required by the bridge replacements. The trail would improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility in the study area and is consistent with community planning.
Incorporate Transportation System Management elements such as signal timing, turn lanes, and consideration for transit stops.

Schedule

The Project as we've described it is an Environmental Assessment (EA.) The initial step is scoping. The EA is the first step in implementing improvements and this part of the project is expected to take approximately three years to complete. The major milestones in the schedule include gaining endorsement by stakeholders, developing criteria, analyzing alternatives and finally, preparation and approval of the final environmental document.

Decision Making Process

Fundamental to any successful project is the design and execution of the decision making process and its interdependency on the public process, the technical design and the environmental analysis. The US 24 West Project schedule for public input, technical decisions, and environmental analysis will be planned around the following process.

The first step is to gain endorsement on the decision making process under which the project will operate through its completion.

The next step requires a clear and thorough understanding of all stakeholder concerns about the function and service provided by US 24 West within the project area. These concerns will then be used to develop the project critical issues and the evaluation criteria.
View list of Ideas Gathered through Jan. '05

Addressing the critical issues becomes the foundation for developing solutions. Beginning with ideas that are developed into concepts and ultimately into alternatives, the stakeholders' input designs the solution. View Critical Issues with Associated Comments

Vision, Critical Issues, and Criteria Chart

The criteria, developed from the stakeholder input, will be applied to each idea, concept and alternative to measure how well they address the critical issues and meet project goals. Level 1 screening will measure ideas for effectiveness in addressing the critical issues (the need) and in meeting the goals (the purpose). Level 2 will qualitatively measure the potential solution for their effectiveness in addressing the critical issues and meeting the goals. Level 3 will be a more detailed analysis to measure the impacts of the alternatives balanced with their ability to meet the project goals.

From this analysis, alternatives will be taken forward and described in the environmental document. This document will detail the alternatives including the major transportation elements needed, mitigation, enhancements that are desired, and guidelines for implementation.

At each step in this process all stakeholders will be involved to provide ideas, input and guidance. Stakeholders for the US 24 West process include the residents and businesses along the corridor, commuters, Federal, State and Local officials, environmental and historic groups, parks, retail areas dependent on the corridor for access, and interested citizens.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Who are the sponsoring agencies for this project?
FHWA and Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) are the sponsoring agencies. In addition, CDOT coordinated with US Army Corps of Engineers, US Fish and Wildlife, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, State Historic Preservation Office, City of Colorado Springs, and other local agencies.

Why are improvements on the corridor needed?
Constructed as a bypass in 1964, US 24 is the only highway route into the Rocky Mountains for nearly 50 miles north and south of Colorado Springs. Today the highway serves local and regional travelers between mountain communities and the Colorado Springs metropolitan area. Current travel patterns and volumes on the highway have resulted in congested conditions during peak travel periods. Continued growth in El Paso and Teller Counties will exacerbate these congested conditions if improvements are not made to the highway.

Specific operation problems along US 24 include the following:
• Local cross streets add traffic volumes to US 24 which slow speeds,
• Traffic volumes at signalized intersections exceed capacity resulting in back up traffic on the highway, and
• Unsignalized intersections have unacceptable delays to traffic trying to cross orenter US 24.

Who should I contact for more information?
The project team can be reached by phone or email.
Phone: 719-477-4970
Email: [email protected]
http://www.coloradodot.info/projects/us24west

In 2008, the project's total property acquisitions was announced at 61 commercial and 6 residential properties. Has that changed?
The Right-of-Way or the footprint of the US24 improvements has not changed since the public meeting in August of 2008. The Environmental Assessment (EA) reports both full and partial acquisitions. The EA reports the acquisitions by parcel, property ownership type, and acreage. Further the EA discusses the number of residential and business relocations that are expected to occur. Through the EA analysis it was discovered that some properties thought to contain one residence actual contained as many as 14. It was also found that some commercially zoned properties held both a business and a residence. This information has been reported in the EA. Therefore, although the numbers have changed, the actual footprint of the US 24 improvements has not changed.

Why does the proposed action keep US 24 a two-lane facility west of 31st Street?
By removing the intersection at Ridge Rd and US 24 this increases capacity of US 24 making the two lanes sufficient west of 31st Street. Three lanes are required east of 31st Street to allow space for turn lanes and 3 lanes through the intersection for east bound travel.

The 25th Street bridge is on the RTA's Priority A list for replacement. Why is this replacement needed if it’s just going to be removed in the future when the highway is improved?
Since the bridge will not be needed after the US24 improvement project, CDOT has coordinated with Colorado Springs’ staff and the City has determined not to replace the bridge as planned, but instead repair the existing structure.

Why were no bicycle lanes included in the proposed action?
For safety reasons, there are no bicycle lanes on US 24, however, the Midland bike/pedestrian and equestrian trail runs parallel to US 24 between the Pikes Peak Greenway Trail and Ridge Road. The existing four block gap between 21st Street and 25th Street will be connected by the proposed project. The project will also construct other improvements to bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the corridor. Sidewalks would be constructed along each of the cross streets to US 24 to improve pedestrian mobility to the north and south of US 24. Improvements at Ridge Road and US 24 will provide pedestrian and bicycle access to the Red Rock Canyon Open Space.

What will happen to the Fountain Creek?
In conjunction with the redesign and development efforts for US 24, CDOT, the City, highway users and adjacent landowners have joined forces to develop restoration strategies for Fountain Creek. The vision is to establish a major recreational amenity corridor or greenway along Fountain Creek. The greenway will make the US24 neighborhoods truly “walkable communities”. Water quality facilities will be incorporated into the greenway improvements. One of CDOT’s commitments as a part of the US24 project is to preserve and restore the Fountain Creek ecosystem.

How will improvements to US 24 accommodate transit?
Currently, bus service is operated by Mountain Metro Transit, a division of the City of Colorado Springs. They have four routes that operate in the US 24 corridor but none of them run on US 24. Colorado/Manitou Avenue is the existing local transit route. The Ute Pass Express was a regional demonstration bus service on US 24 between downtown Colorado Springs and mountain communities that ended in the fall of 2011. There is
private bus service running through the corridor which is provided by the casinos to their Cripple Creek businesses. The proposed action would continue to accommodate express bus service on US 24 for regional travelers and existing bus service on city streets for local travelers. At the northeast corner of US 24 and 31st Street, the proposed action would enhance transit operations in the study area by providing land for a new park and ride facility, which would be built by others.

What public outreach has been done on this project?
The project team provided a variety of opportunities for soliciting public input and involvement into the EA process. The team encouraged open communication and was responsive to all groups and individuals interested in the project. Public outreach on the US 24 West project included public open houses, neighborhood organization and small group meetings, workshops, newsletters, website postings, and media information. In addition, the following teams were also formed: Executive Leadership Team, Technical Leadership Team, Aesthetic Working Group, the Midland Greenway Advisory Committee, and the Fountain Creek Restoration Project. In addition, a project website was a dynamic tool for providing access to reports, documents, newsletters, announcements and meeting summaries. Media relations played an active role in disseminating information about the project. Additionally, a public website has been used to provide updated information on the project, www.coloradodot.info/projects/us24west.

What are the next steps?
The EA document will be released for a 45 day public review and comment period in early summer of 2012. A public hearing will be held during that time to present information and solicit public and agency comments. Following the public comment period, CDOT and Federal Highway Administration will consider and address all comments and publish a decision document.

What is the cost of the project? What is the construction schedule?
The project is included in the “Moving Forward Update” (the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan) adopted in January 2012 by the Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG). The estimated cost for US24 improvements, from Ridge Road to 8th Street, is $230 million for construction and $50 million for right-of-way. These costs do not include improvements at I-25/Cimarron. This interchange is listed separately in the Regional Transportation Plan with a cost estimate of $95 million.

The Regional Transportation Plan assumes that the Proposed Action would be built in phases over several years as funding comes available. To facilitate implementation of the entire project, the US 24 corridor has been broken into construction packages that can be built independently and upon completion, will provide immediate benefits to the community. The timing for each phase is dependent on future funding.

How is the I-25/Cimarron interchange related to the US24 improvements?
I-25 /Cimarron interchange was approved as a part of the I-25 EA in 2004. During the US24 design, modifications to the I-25/Cimarron interchange were suggested that would improve operations for both US24 and the interchange. These modifications have been discussed in the US24 EA. The I-25/Cimarron project is identified in the PPACG 2035 Regional Transportation Plan as a separate project.

Will noise walls be constructed as part of the project?
After conducting a noise analysis for the proposed action, CDOT determined that noise walls would be reasonable and feasible along US 24 at the following locations:

Area	Height	Approximate Length
11th Street to 14th Street	18 feet	1,400 to 1,500 feet
A-1 Mobile Homes	15 feet	1,400 to 1,500 feet
Red Canyon Place	15 feet	800 to 1,000 feet

These walls are forecasted to mitigate noise levels for 110 residences along US 24.

How did the public’s ideas influence this project?
The public’s input helped craft the vision, the critical issues and criteria. Additionally, they contributed many of the 395 ideas, nine potential solutions and two alternatives that were evaluated. Specifically, there were 51 ideas from the public that influenced the design of the proposed action. These ideas from the public have been highlighted in the booklet “Shifting Gears” prepared by the project team. Public input influenced the Aesthetic Guidelines, the design speed, the economic analysis, and the Fountain Creek
Greenway Master Plan.

What has CDOT done to address Aesthetics in the corridor?
Aesthetic Guidelines were developed in conjunction with the community stakeholders. These guidelines provide direction for project features such as wall and bridge treatments. These guidelines are available on the web site, www.coloradodot.info/projects/us24west.

What is likely to be the first project on the corridor?
The 8th Street and I-25/Cimarron interchanges are the highest priority on the corridor. This does not preclude other projects as funding becomes available.

How will this project coordinate with the Gold Hill Mesa Development?
The US24 team has coordinated with the Gold Hill Mesa development continually throughout the project development. Gold Hill Mesa access needs were included in the US24 improvement analysis. The recent Fountain Creek Restoration at Gold Hill Mesa is an example of the partnership formed among CDOT, the City of Colorado Springs and Gold Hill Mesa to move improvements forward.

Why doesn’t this project include the Manitou Avenue Interchange?
The US 24 project does not include improvements at the Manitou Avenue interchange because analysis of existing and future safety and traffic operations indicate that improvements are not needed.

Were high occupancy lanes (HOV) lanes studied for the corridor?
Yes. HOV lanes were suggested as a solution in the beginning of the project, as was light rail to Teller County. A member of the Technical Leadership Team, representing Mountain Metro Transit reviewed these suggestions and the long range plans for transit on US24 and found that US 24 West was not planned as an HOV corridor nor a light rail corridor.

What is going on with the Express Inn?
A. CDOT has identified the Express Inn as a property needed to complete improvements for the interchange upgrades at I-25/Cimarron and 8th Street. CDOT does not currently own this property.

51 ways the community shaped the solution for US 24 West

Concepts that Shaped the Project

Partnership Opportunities

Thank You

Planning Documents Reviewed by the US 24 Project Team

Planning Study Reviews

City of Colorado Springs Comprehensive Plan - January 2001

City of Colorado Springs Bicycle Planning Documents (Incorporates the Intermodal Transportation Plan Chapter, Colorado Springs Bicycle Plan, PPACG 2020 Regional Transportation Plan Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Plan) - June 2001

City of Colorado Springs Intermodal Transportation Plan - April 2001

City of Colorado Springs Pikes Peak Regional Park and Ride Plan Final Technical Memorandum - March 2003

City of Colorado Springs 2030 Public Transportation Plan - September 2004

El Paso County Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Gold Hill Mesa Traffic Study - 2004

I-25 Mode Feasibility Analysis - December 2000

I-25 Environmental Assessment - September 2004

Manitou Springs Rainbow Vision Plan - 2000

Midland/Fountain Creek Parkway Corridor Plan - 1988

Midland Master Plan: Amendment to the Westside Plan - 1986

Pikes Peak Historical Street Railway Foundation - March 2005

PPACG 2030 Regional Transportation Plan - October 2004

PPACG Transportation Improvement Plan, 2005-2010 - October 2004

Sustaining Nature and Community in the Pike Peak Region: A Sourcebook for Analyzing Regional Cumulative Effects - December 2003

US 24 Safety/Corridor Study: Colorado Springs to Woodland Park - 1996

Westside Plan: plan for the stabilization and renewal of the Westside Community Development area of Colorado Springs - May 1980

Other Planning Studies for Reference

Colorado Springs Parks, Recreation & Trails Master Plan - January 2000

City of Colorado Springs Open Space Plan - 1997

Colorado Springs Rapid Transit Feasibility Study - 2004

East – West Mobility Study - January 2002

El Paso County Master Plan - Current

Fountain Creek Watershed Plan - November 2003

Manitou Springs Open Space Plan - 1997

Mesa Springs Community Plan - July 1986

The Pikes Peak Greenway Master Plan - January 1994

Pikes Peak Multi-Use Plan - September 1999

Red Rock Canyon Open Space Master Plan - May 2004

State Highway No. 4 Plan and Proposed Profile - 1959

Survey of Critical Biological Resources: El Paso County, Colorado - December 2001

Survey of Critical Wetlands and Riparian Areas in El Paso and Pueblo Counties, Colorado - June 2001

Ute Pass Comprehensive Plan - February 1982

Zoning Map Book, City of Colorado Springs - October 1995

Aesthetic Working Group Sessions

Three Aesthetic Working Group Sessions were held at the Community Partnership for Child Development
2330 Robinson Street, Colorado Springs

Exhibits from the January 21, 2009 Session

Exhibits from the November 19, 2008 Session

Exhibits from the 4-22-09 Aesthetic Working Group

Design Guidelines

esthetics Guidelines Intro and Urban, View pages 1-18

Aesthetic Guidelines Rural, View Pages 19-26

Appendix, View Pages 27-43

US24_DesignGuidelines Intro and Urban Section 1.pdf: 38MB
US24_DesignGuidelines Rural Section.pdf: 18MB
US24_DesignGuidelines Appendix.pdf: 38MB

US 24 West Environmental Assessment May 2012

The Colorado Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration have completed an EA regarding the impacts of the safety and capacity improvements for the US 24 West in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

You may download and read the EA by clicking on the links below:

Chapter 1 – Purpose and Need

Chapter 2 – Alternatives

Chapter 3 – Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

Chapter 4 –Section 4(f) Evaluation

Chapter 5 – Agency Coordination and Public Involvement

Chapter 6 - References

Appendix A – Alternatives Maps

Appendix B – Alternatives Analysis

Appendix C – Technical Memoranda

Appendix D – Agency Correspondence

Appendix E – Public Involvement Coordination

Appendix F – Corridor Aesthetic Guidelines

Appendix G – Wetland Finding Report

Appendix H – Section 106 Consultation

Appendix I – Mitigation Agreements for Section 4(f) Use

Get Involved

Exhibits from the Public Open House meetings and the Aesthetics Working Group sessions.

Exhibits from the June 11, 2012 Public Meeting

Aesthetics Working Group Sessions:
Exhibits from the 4-22-09 Aesthetic Working Group

Exhibits from the Aesthetic Working Group Session 1-19-09

Exhibits from the Aesthetic Working Group Session 11-19-08

Public Open House Meetings:
Exhibits from the Open House Thursday, August 28, 2008
Information from Formal Presentation Thursday, August 24, 2006
Exhibits from the Open House Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Exhibits from the Open House January 26, 2006
Exhibits from the Open House November 10, 2005
Exhibits from June 21, 2005
Exhibits from April 14, 2005
Exhibits from January 20, 2005
Exhibits from November. 18, 2004

Environmental Assessment

An Environmental Assessment (EA) is a comprehensive study that evaluates potential impacts, both positive and negative, of alternative actions under consideration. An EA was prepared for US 24 West to provide decision makers at the Federal Highway Administration and the Colorado Department of Transportation with information on no-action and build alternatives, including potential impacts to the built, natural, and social environments that may occur within the project study area. The EA will help agency officials decide which project alternative to approve based on the environmental consequences of each alternative.

View Powerpoint "Environmental Early Data Collection"

Planning Documents Reviewed by the US 24 Project Team

The EA for US 24 West evaluated potential impacts to resources such as right of way, air quality, noise, cultural resources, hazardous waste, low income and minority populations, neighborhoods and land use. Proposed mitigation measures to minimize or avoid potential impacts were identified in the EA.

If there are no significant impacts from the proposed action, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is prepared. If the EA indicates significant impacts will occur from the proposed action, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is prepared. The EA is being prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969.

Copies of the Environmental Assessment are available in hard copy format for public review at the following locations and/or by request from CDOT Region 2.

Questions about this project may be directed to:

Mail: US 24 EA Comments c/o Wilson & Company
5755 Mark Dabling Boulevard, Suite 220
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80919-2200

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 719-477-4970

Fax: 719-520-0108

Resources

Related Studies

Related Links (City, County, CDOT, FHWA, and other related links)

Press Room

Resources

Midland Greenway Brochure January 2009
Postcard March 2008
Newsletters:
Fact Sheets
- Project Update March 2007
Other Fact Sheets

Media Kits and Press Releases

The proposed action for US 24 West from I-25 to the Manitou Avenue Exit includes the following elements:

Maintain four through-lanes (two in each direction) between I-25 and 21st Street.
Add two through-lanes, between 21st Street and just west of Ridge Road, for a total of six through-lanes (three in each direction).
Replace nine bridges on US 24 and cross streets to accommodate the profile changes to US 24. Over Fountain Creek, these bridges would be built to comply with current state and local standards to reduce flooding hazards in the study area.
Due to replacement of the nine bridges, realign and widen Fountain Creek at bridge crossings and locations where the roadway overlaps the existing channel to provide an armored low-flow channel and a widened stabilized area to accommodate the 100-year flood.

Build single-point diamond interchange (SPDI) with a loop ramp for eastbound-to-northbound travel at US 24 and I-25. This interchange design replaces the tight diamond interchange identified in the I-25 Improvements through the Colorado Springs Urbanized Area EA (CDOT, 2004). Since that EA was approved, traffic forecasts and future traffic operations have been revised by the Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments (PPACG), making a SPDI design more efficient operationally.

Naegle Road from 21st Street to 25th Street would be closed because the intersection of 21st Street and Naegle Road is too close to the US 24 and 21st Street interchange. There is inadequate room to provide a turn lane for vehicles at Naegle Road.
The existing 25th Street bridge over Fountain Creek would be removed because it would no longer connect to Naegle Road and, therefore, provide no function. The existing 25th Street would be ended north of the Fountain Creek.

Replace the existing at-grade intersections with interchanges at 8th Street and at 21^st Street, which also includes directional interchange ramps and acceleration/deceleration lanes.
Upgrade the US 24 and 26th Street at-grade intersection, which also includes left and right turn lanes.
Widen the intersection of US 24 and 31st Street. Widen the 31st Street and Colorado Avenue intersection. South of US 24, 31st Street would be rebuilt to better align with the highway intersection.
Replace the existing at-grade intersection with an overpass that carries US 24 over Ridge Road. Ridge Road would be widened between High Street and Colorado Avenue and improvements would be made to the Ridge Road and Colorado Avenue intersection.
All improvements tie into the unimproved, existing US 24 approximately 1,800 feet west of Ridge Road. Because neither existing nor future congestion is a problem between Ridge Road and Manitou Avenue, no changes to US 24 are proposed west of Ridge Road.
Build sidewalks on the north-south cross streets at all intersections and as a part of all interchanges.
Connect the Midland Trail from 21st to 25th Street, with north-south trail connections at each of the interchanges and intersections along the US 24 corridor. The trail would be built to meet the City of Colorado Spring’s trail design standards and to allow clearance under the bridges for bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian crossings. Completing this east-west bicycle and pedestrian trail system was an opportunity resulting from the required roadway right-of-way acquisitions and the channel re-grading required by the bridge replacements. The trail would improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility in the study area and is consistent with community planning.
Incorporate Transportation System Management elements such as signal timing, turn lanes, and consideration for transit stops.

Exhibits from the Public Open House meetings and the Aesthetics Working Group sessions.

Exhibits from the June 11, 2012 Public Meeting

Aesthetics Working Group Sessions:
Exhibits from the 4-22-09 Aesthetic Working Group

Exhibits from the Aesthetic Working Group Session 1-19-09

Exhibits from the Aesthetic Working Group Session 11-19-08

Environmental Assessment

View Powerpoint "Environmental Early Data Collection"

Planning Documents Reviewed by the US 24 Project Team

Copies of the Environmental Assessment are available in hard copy format for public review at the following locations and/or by request from CDOT Region 2.

Questions about this project may be directed to:

Mail: US 24 EA Comments c/o Wilson & Company
5755 Mark Dabling Boulevard, Suite 220
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80919-2200

Email: [email protected]

Phone: 719-477-4970

Fax: 719-520-0108

Resources

Related Studies

Related Links (City, County, CDOT, FHWA, and other related links)

Press Room

Resources

Midland Greenway Brochure January 2009
Postcard March 2008
Newsletters:
Fact Sheets
- Project Update March 2007
Other Fact Sheets

Media Kits and Press Releases

View Powerpoint "Environmental Early Data Collection"

Planning Documents Reviewed by the US 24 Project Team