Contractor Dispute & Claim Resolution Process
Overview
The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Colorado Contractors’ Association (CCA) jointly developed a Dispute and Claim Resolution Process that provides the foundation to resolve issues at the lowest level on a project. When an issue cannot be resolved within the contract at the project level, it then becomes a Dispute. When the dispute cannot be resolved within the contract at the project level, it shall be presented to the Dispute Review Board (DRB). If CDOT and the Contractor are unable to resolve the dispute after a DRB provides a recommendation, the dispute escalates to a Claim.
Dispute Resolution Process (DRP) Final Report - The objective of this research project was to conduct a detailed review of Colorado’s Dispute Resolution Process (DRP) and provide suggestions for improvement to the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) DRP.
CDOT Form 1318 Dispute and Claim Status Report - Use this form to track the dispute resolution process on your project.
CDOT Form 1378 Contractor Selection of Litigation or Arbitration - This form is no longer required for contracts using the CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction 2023 or newer since arbitration has been removed.
CDOT Form 1379 Dispute Review Board Three Party Agreement - If required by the contract, use this form in collaboration with the CDOT Resident Engineer and notify the Construction Area Engineer to execute a Dispute Resolution Board.
CDOT Form 1380 Contactor's Claim Certification - Use for contractor's and subcontractor's claims.
Dispute Review Board (DRB)
CDOT maintains a list of approved DRB Candidates on this webpage who are experienced in highway construction processes and the interpretation of contract documents. This webpage also includes the CDOT DRB Candidate Solicitation Form, the CDOT DRB Code of Ethics and Nominee Disclosure Guidelines, the CDOT DRB Nominee Disclosure Form, and past DRB Recommendations, as seen below.
Dispute Review Board Candidate Approval
Interested candidates should review the CDOT DRB Code of Ethics and Nominee Disclosure Guidelines, the CDOT Standard Specifications (SS) for Road and Bridge Construction subsections 105.22 - Dispute Resolution, 105.23 - Dispute Review Board, and 105.24 - Claims for Unresolved Disputes, and the CDOT Form 1379, Dispute Review Board Three Party Agreement. The compensation details for a DRB member are included in the CDOT SS subsection 105.23 (m) - Cost and Payments.
When applying, the interested candidate should complete the CDOT DRB Candidate Solicitation Form electronically and email the completed form to [email protected]. In the email subject line, include the Candidate’s name and "DRB Candidate Selection." Please do not include any other attachments to the email.
After CDOT and the Colorado Contractors Association (CCA) review the candidate’s CDOT DRB Candidate Solicitation Form, the candidate will be notified by email if they are approved or not. If approved, the Candidate’s information and their CDOT DRB Candidate Solicitation Form will be made available to the public on the List of Dispute Review Board Candidates, as seen below.
List of Dispute Review Board Candidates
The process for selecting DRB members is outlined in the CDOT SS subsection 105.23 (b) - Formation of Dispute Review Board.
The CDOT Project Engineer and the Contractor project staff should contact their selected DRB member to determine their availability and disclosures. The DRB member will review the CDOT DRB Code of Ethics and Nominee Disclosure Guidelines, then complete the CDOT DRB Nominee Disclosure Form, and return it to the party that contacted them. Once the DRB has three (3) members, the CDOT and Contractor selected DRB members should contact the third member to determine their availability and disclosures.
Once CDOT and the Contractor have agreed on the DRB, the Project Engineer will prepare the CDOT Form 1379, Dispute Review Board Three Party Agreement for signatures and distribution. The completed CDOT DRB Nominee Disclosure Form for each member must be attached when routing the CDOT Form 1379 for signatures. The DRB members must sign the CDOT Form 1379 first, followed by the Contractor, and finally the CDOT Chief Engineer will sign last.
DRB members may not perform work or submit invoices until the CDOT Form 1379 is fully executed. The process for DRB member reimbursement is outlined in the CDOT SS subsection 105.23 (m) - Cost and Payments and the CDOT Form 1379, Dispute Review Board Three Party Agreement.
For information only.
| Name | Employer | City | State | Phone Number | Email Address |
|
Self-Employed Escalante Construction Management and Engineering, Inc. |
Mancos |
CO |
970-759-5320 |
||
|
HNTB/ Baffoe ADR |
Greensboro |
NC |
347-724-8600 |
||
| HCIC2, LLC |
Carlsbad |
CA |
619- 253-0915 |
||
|
Retired Self-Consultant |
Henderson |
NV |
702- 335-6022 |
||
|
Wiss, Janney Elstner Assoc., Inc. |
Platteville |
CO |
303-883-8130 |
||
|
TNT Consulting TN LLC |
Chattanooga |
TN |
541-285-4113 |
||
|
D/B/A Constructive Dispute Resolutions |
Hingham |
MA |
781-985-2944 |
||
|
Self-Employed |
Greeley |
CO |
970-301-1125 |
||
|
Q Works, Inc. |
Norcross |
GA |
404-408-0151 |
||
|
Dialed-In Partners |
San Pedro |
CA |
310-781-0181 |
||
|
Self-Employed |
Denver |
CO |
303-229-8668 |
||
|
Self-Employed |
Denver |
CO |
303-893-3107 |
||
|
Atlas Technical Consultants |
Denver |
CO |
303-944-6332 |
||
|
Woods Aitken LLP |
Denver |
CO |
303-606-6720 |
||
|
California State University |
Irvine |
CA |
818-441-1055 |
||
|
Larsen Analytics LLC |
North Salt Lake |
UT |
801-541-9155 |
||
|
Giselle Leonardo P.A. Independent Arbitrator |
Fort Lauderdale |
FL |
954-728-9026 |
||
|
Lollar Engineering LLC |
Colorado Springs |
CO |
719-659-8201 |
||
|
Colorado Mediation Center, LLC |
Boulder |
CO |
303-415-2042 |
||
|
Sequoia Consultants |
Bakersfield |
CA |
619-246-5951 |
||
|
Self-Employed |
Walnut Creek |
CA |
925-348-0177 |
Code of Ethics
Board members must avoid the appearance of, or any actual, conflict of interest during the term of the Dispute Board. Board members must disclose, before their appointment, any interest, past or present relationship, or association that could reasonably be considered by a contracting party as likely to affect that member’s independence or impartiality. If, during the term of a Dispute Board, a Board member becomes aware of any fact or circumstance that might reasonably be considered by a contracting party as likely to affect that Board member’s independence or impartiality, the Board member must inform the other Board members and disclose the matter to the contracting parties.
Board members must ensure that information acquired during the term of the Dispute Board remains confidential and must not be disclosed unless such information is already in the public domain. Any such confidential information may only be disclosed if approved by the contracting parties or if compelled by law. Board members must not use such confidential information for any purpose beyond the activities of the Dispute Board.
Board members must conduct all Board activities in an expeditious, diligent, orderly, and impartial manner. Board members must act honestly, with integrity and without bias. There must be no unilateral communications as between a Board member and a contracting party, except as permitted under the Dispute Board operating procedures.
All Board meetings and hearings must be conducted in accordance with the applicable contract provisions and operating procedures, in a manner that provides procedural fairness to the contracting parties. Dispute Board recommendations and decisions must be made expeditiously on the basis of the provisions of the contract, the applicable law and the information, facts and circumstances submitted by the contracting parties.
Party directly involved: The contracting parties: the owner, the contractor, and all joint-venture partners.
Party indirectly involved: The construction manager, subcontractors of any tier, suppliers, designers, architects, other professional service firms, or consultants to any party.
Financial ties: Ownership interest, loans, receivables, or payables, etc.
Prohibited: Service as a DRB member should not be allowed.
Disclose: A written statement to both parties setting forth all the facts.
Written permission: Written acknowledgement that both parties are aware of the disclosed facts and agree that they do not preclude participation as a DRB member.
- Direct Employment
- Current employees of any of the parties directly or indirectly involved must be prohibited from serving as Board members for the project.
- It is not recommended that past employees of either party serve as Board members. However, if a prospective Board member is a past employee of one of the parties directly involved, then, in addition to disclosure, permission from the other party must be obtained before agreeing to serve on the DRB.
- If a prospective Board member is a past employee of one of the parties indirectly involved, this must be disclosed to both parties prior to appointment to the DRB.
- Discussions concerning future employment of a Board member by a party directly or indirectly involved are prohibited throughout the life of the DRB.
- Consulting Assignments
- Individuals who are employed in a consulting capacity by any of the parties directly involved must be prohibited from serving as Board members for the project.
- Individuals currently employed as a consultant by one of the parties indirectly involved must, in addition to disclosure, obtain permission from both contracting parties before agreeing to serve on the DRB.
- Previous employment as a consultant by any party directly or indirectly involved must be disclosed prior to appointment.
- Discussions with a Board member about future consulting work with one of the parties directly involved is prohibited.
- Board members should obtain permission from both parties prior to agreeing on future consulting for parties indirectly involved.
- Financial Ties
- Individuals with current financial ties to any of the parties directly involved must be prohibited from serving as Board members for the project.
- Individuals with current financial ties to any of the parties indirectly involved must disclose such relationships prior to appointment.
- Previous financial ties with any party directly or indirectly involved must be disclosed prior to appointment to the DRB.
- During the course of the project, the establishment of financial ties or discussions about future such financial ties with any party directly involved is prohibited.
- Obtain permission from both contracting parties before discussing future financial ties with any party indirectly involved in the project.
- Close Personal or Professional Relationships
- Close personal or professional relationships that could give rise to the perception of bias with a key member of any party directly or indirectly involved must be disclosed and such relationship completely understood and accepted by the parties prior to appointment to the DRB.
- The establishment of close personal or professional relationships with a key member of the parties directly or indirectly involved during the course of the project must be avoided. In the event that such relationships develop, Board members must disclose the nature of the relationships to both parties and offer his/her resignation if warranted.
- Services as a DRB member on another contract involving one or more of the parties
- Candidates must disclose all past and current service as a Board member on projects where any of the parties directly or indirectly involved were also involved. Describe the role of the involved parties on the other project.
- In addition to disclosure, obtain permission from each contracting party before agreeing to serve on another DRB for a contract in which one of the contracting parties is directly involved. If one of the contracting parties is indirectly involved on the other contract, this must be disclosed along with a description of their role on the other contract.
- Before agreeing to serve on another DRB for a contract in which a party indirectly involved is involved on both projects, disclose this relationship to both contracting parties and obtain permission whenever the role of the indirectly involved party is significant.
These guidelines are summarized in the following table where “past” is any time prior to execution of the Dispute Review Board Three Party Agreement on this project, “current” is anytime during the life of the project, and “future” is any time after termination of the DRB on the contract.
The repeated selection of the same individual by either (1) a particular owner or contractor, or (2) only owners or only contractors can lead to the perception of bias. While individuals in these categories may be completely impartial and neutral, it is the perception of bias that is the concern. The important point is that both parties should avoid selecting Board members that may engender the perception of bias.
For information only.
To request previous Dispute Review Board (DRB) Recommendations, please contact: [email protected]
| Region | Project Number and Description |
Subaccount |
Specification and Description |
Accepted/Rejected/ Partial Acceptance |
Delivery Date |
| 1 |
NHPP_0703-445 Widening WB lanes on I-70 between M.P. 243 & Exit 232 |
21893 |
|
Rejected by Contractor | 2021 |
| 1 |
NHPP 0703-435 480V Motor Control Center replacement Eisenhower and Johnson Memorial Tunnel on I-70 |
21223R |
613.12 - Wiring payment |
Accepted | 2021 |
| 1 |
IM 0253-234 Dispute No. 3 - North I-25 Segment 3 Express Lanes Project |
19626 |
CDOT Impacts to the Planned Earthwork |
Accepted | 2020 |
| 1 |
IM 0253-234 Dispute No. 2 - 1-25 Managed Lanes, Segment 3 |
19626 |
108.03
|
Rejected by CDOT | 2018 |
| 1 |
IM 0253-234 I-25 Express Lanes 120th - SH 7 |
19626 | 102.04 Interpretation of Plans and Specification | Accepted | 2018 |
| 1 |
IM070-222 I-70 over Havana Bridge Replacement |
19339 |
Design/Build Maintenance issue |
Accepted | 2018 |
| 1 |
IM070-222 I-70 Havana Bridge Replacement |
19339 | 105.03 Conformity to the Contract | Accepted | 2018 |
| 1 |
NHPP 4701-124 Segment 4/5 |
18999 | 108.08 Failure to Complete Work on Time | Accepted | 2018 |
| 1 |
NHPP 4701-124 I-25/C-470 Interchange Design |
18999 | 105.22(b) - Request for Equitable Adjustment | Accepted | 2018 |
| 1 |
IM2254-076 I-225 Parker to Mississippi Reconstruction |
17083 | Multiple Items | Accepted | 2015 |
| 1 |
STA 177A-077 SH 177 University Concrete Repair |
17734 | 108.09 - Failure to Complete Work on Time | Accepted | 2012 |
| 1 |
ESI 0852-095 US-85 Titan to Cook Ranch |
14976 | 108.03 - Schedule Liquidated Damages | Rejected by Contractor | 2012 |
| 1 |
ESI 0852-095 US-85 Titan to Cook Ranch |
14976 | 107.25 - Water Quality Control Liquidated Damages | Rejected by Contractor | 2011 |
| 1 |
ESI 0852-095 US-85 Titan to Cook Ranch |
14976 | 203 - Excavation and Embankment. Differing Site Conditions | Rejected by Contractor | 2011 |
| 1 |
C 0252-390 I-25 Frontage Road Douglas County |
16025 | 412-13 - PCCP Joints and Dowel Placements | Accepted | 2010 |
| 1 |
STA 0404-044 Colfax, 6th Ave. at I-70 |
15821R |
109.06 - Partial Payment AC and Fuel Cost Adjustments |
Accepted | 2009 |
| 2 |
STM 1151-038 SH 115 M.P. 27.71 to M.P. 38.94 |
22903 |
400 Pavement: Concerning Quantity Overrun of Thin Bonded Overlay (Polyester Concrete) |
Accepted | 2025 |
| 2 |
STM 1151-038 SH 115 M.P. 27.71 to M.P. 38.94 |
22903 | 104.03 Extra Work: Project Delay Due to Soft Spot Repair | Accepted | 2025 |
| 2 |
STM 1151-038 SH 115 M.P. 27.71 to M.P. 38.94 |
22903 |
104.03 Extra Work: Separate and Threshold Dispute Regarding Asphalt Quantity form Payment |
Accepted | 2025 |
| 2 |
FBR 025A-019 Project I-25 Ilex Design Build - Pueblo, CO |
19205 | Iron Phoenix Bridge delay | Rejected by Contractor | 2019 |
| 2 |
FSA 0503-081 US 50 McCulloch Blvd. to Wills. Blvd. Quantum |
19751 | 630 - Construction Zone Traffic Control - Night Time | Accepted | 2017 |
| 2 |
I 025A-016 I-25 Widening North of Colorado Springs |
18842 | Revision of Section 403 – Hot Mix Asphalt | Rejected by CDOT | 2015 |
| 2 |
FBR 3501-013 SH 350 Bridge Replacement |
18208 | 104.02 - Differing Site Conditions, Suspensions of Work, and Significant Changes in the Character of Work | Accepted | 2014 |
| 2 |
BR 0252-422 I-25/US 24 Bridge Repairs |
18955 | 630 - Construction Zone Traffic Control | Accepted | 2014 |
| 2 |
FBR 096A-039 SH 96 Bridges |
17668 | 203 - Excavation and Embankment | Accepted | 2013 |
| 2 |
FBR 096A-039 SH 96 Bridges |
17668 | 625 - Construction Surveying | Accepted | 2013 |
| 2 |
FBR 096A-039 SH 96 Bridges |
17668 | 625 - Construction Surveying | Accepted | 2013 |
| 2 |
FBR 096A-039 SH 96 Bridges |
17668 | 625 - Construction Surveying | Accepted | 2013 |
| 2 |
NH 0505-046 US 50 Hasty to McClave Jct |
18242 | 108.03 - Schedule Liquidated Damages | Accepted | 2013 |
| 2 |
FBR C160-008 NB I-25 AT Missouri Creek |
18115 | 108.09 - Failure to Complete Work on Time | Rejected by Contractor | 2012 |
| 2 |
C 021A-001 Improvements at Powers and Dublin |
17604 | 403 - Hot Mix Asphalt | Rejected by Contractor | 2011 |
| 2 |
NH 016A -039 SH 16 / US 85 |
15915 | 206 - Excavation and Backfill for Structures | Accepted | 2010 |
|
3 |
C 5502-097 US 550 Otter Road to R3/R5 Line |
22020 |
Eleven (11) Various Disputes |
Accepted | 2025 |
|
3 |
STA 0131-063 |
19470 |
108.03 Schedule |
Accepted | 2018 |
| 3 |
HB 135 A-024 SH-135 Crested Butte South |
16446 | 700 - Materials Details | Accepted | 2010 |
| 3 |
SHE 0702-267 I-70 W. of Vail Wildlife Fence |
15903R | 203 - Excavating and Embankment. Differing Site Conditions | Accepted | 2009 |
| 4 |
STA2873-1 US 287: SH 1 to LaPorte Bypass |
12372 | 108.08 Failure to Complete Work on Time: Liquidated Damages | Accepted | 2025 |
| 4 |
STA 2873-100 US 287 - SH 1 to LaPorte Bypass |
12372 | 108.08 & 108.09 | Rejected by Contractor | 2020 |
| 4 |
BR 0361-117 US 36 Culvert Repair |
20610 | 109.04 Compensation for Changes & 109.10 Compensation for Compensable Delays | Accepted | 2018 |
| 4 |
FBR 0142-055 SH 14 Bridge over Poudre River (MP 135.909) |
18085 | 104.02 - Differing Site Conditions | Accepted | 2016 |
| 4 |
STA 0072-010 Reconstruction Cherryvale Road to 75th Street. Quantum |
11873 | 104.02 - Differing Site Conditions, Suspension of Work (Utilities) |
Accepted |
2014 |
| 4 |
STA 0072-010 Reconstruction SH 7 from Cherryvale Road to 75th Street |
11873 | 403 - Hot Mix Asphalt | Accepted | 2013 |
| 4 |
STA 0072-010 Reconstruction Cherryvale Road to 75th Street |
11873 | 104.02 - Differing Site Conditions, Suspension of Work | Rejected by Contractor | 2013 |
| 4 |
STA 0072-010 Reconstruction Cherryvale Road to 75th Street |
11873 | 108.09 - Failure to Complete Work on Time | Rejected portion by Contractor | 2013 |
| 4 |
STA 0072-010 Reconstruction Cherryvale Road to 75th Street |
11873 | 104.02 - Differing Site Conditions, Suspension of Work | Accepted | 2013 |
| 4 |
STA 0661-011 SH 66 Overlay Lyons to SH 287 |
16214 | 202.09 (rev.) Change condition regarding depth of removal of asphalt (planing) | Rejected by Contractor | 2012 |
| 4 |
STA 0661-011 SH 66-US 36 to SH 287 |
16214 | 412 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement | Accepted | 2010 |
| 4 |
STA 0661-011 SH 66 - US 36 to SH 287 |
16214 | 105.07 Conformity to Roadway Smoothness Criteria | Accepted | 2010 |
| 4 |
IM 0253-160 I-25 Reconstruction |
12623 | 504 - Cribbing Plan or Spec Differing Interpretations | Accepted | 2009 |
| 4 |
IM 0253-160 I-25 Reconstruction |
12623 | 601 - Structural Concrete Plan or Spec Differing Interpretations | Accepted | 2009 |
| 4 |
IM 0253-160 I-25 Reconstruction |
12623 | 403 - Hot Mix Asphalt Materials Changes/Out of Spec. | Accepted | 2009 |
| 4 |
IM 0253-160 I-25 Reconstruction |
12623 | 208 - Erosion Control Plan or Spec Differing Interpretations | Accepted | 2009 |
| 4 |
IM 0253-160 I-25 Reconstruction |
12623 | 603 - Culverts and Sewers Plan or Spec Differing Interpretations | Accepted | 2009 |
| 5 |
STR R500-171 Structure K-01-A, Bents 1 & 5 |
20706R | 518 - Waterstops and Expansion Joints | Accepted | 2025 |
| 5 |
BR 184A-003 Priority Culvert SH 184 |
19780 | 104.02 - Differing Site Conditions | Rejected by CDOT | 2015 |
| 5 |
NH 1601-062 Reconstruction US 160, Cortez |
18290 | 104.02 - Differing Site Conditions | Accepted | 2014 |
| 5 |
STA 017A-010 SH 17 Reconstruction |
15176 | 105.05 - Conform to the Cost of Hot Mix Asphalt | Accepted | 2010 |
| 5 |
NH 1602-114 US 160 4th Lane |
16042 | 105.03 - Conformity to the Contract Plan or Spec Differing Interpretations | Accepted | 2008 |
Project First on Construction Projects - Project First formalizes the partnering process to proactively identify and manage risks to CDOT, Contractors, the traveling public, business owners and many others through collaboration. The ultimate goal is to manage project risks and foster collaboration and communication on the project.
